Thanks, works perfectly. On 1 May 2012 15:16, Michael Bayer <mike...@zzzcomputing.com> wrote:
> Since the "uniqueness" makes this kind of a read only thing, I'd use a > plain @property: > > @property > def unique_tags(self): > return set(cat.tag for cat in self.tag_categories) > > > On May 1, 2012, at 10:08 AM, Benjamin Sims wrote: > > > Is there an obvious way to set up an association proxy so that it only > returns distinct objects? > > > > For example, if I have: > > > > Post - Tag - Tag_Category > > > > and would like to access Post.Tag_Categories so that it contains each > category only once. > > > > Any tips appreciated, sure I am missing something obvious here. > > > > Ben > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "sqlalchemy" group. > > To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > sqlalchemy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sqlalchemy" group. > To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > sqlalchemy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sqlalchemy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en.
