On Dec 18, 2012, at 3:53 AM, Yap Sok Ann wrote: > There are a few places in my code that does `q.filter(None)`, e.g. something > like this: > > def base_filter(self): > # subclasses may set this, or not > pass > > def base_query(self): > q = self.model_cls.query > q = q.filter(self.base_filter()) > return q > > Previously, it would generate "SELECT * FROM xxx". > > In 0.8, it now generates "SELECT * FROM xxx WHERE NULL", and subsequently no > row is returned. > > The change was introduced 2 months ago in > http://sqlalchemy.org/trac/changeset/b221bb4385a4 > > Anyway, the 0.8 behavior does feel a bit more correct, so perhaps I shall fix > my code instead :)
yeah there's no specific use case I had anticipated for filter(None) but rendering NULL is more consistent. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sqlalchemy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en.
