On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 9:41 PM, Claudio Freire <klaussfre...@gmail.com>wrote:

> So the whole thing is rolled up into the "named" thing I referred to also,
>> so that there's no need to keep a Query object hanging around, when we say
>> "bake()" we're really just referring to a position in the code somewhere,
>> so I've updated the wiki recipe to use a named system like this:
>>
>> q = s.query(Foo).\
>>                 filter(Foo.data == bindparam('foo')).\
>>                 bake_as("foo", cache)
>>         result = q.params(foo='data 12').all()
>>
>>
>> A highly cleaned up version of your test is attached.
>>
>> I'm still not sure I'm getting everything accounted for here!  thanks for
>> testing !   The feature is actually looking quite simple and probably works
>> better as something built in, or at least if we added some methods to
>> QueryContext to ease the burden of caching/copying it.
>>
>
> Well, if that works, it certainly covers my needs so there would be no
> pressing need to incorporate it into the core.
> I'll let you know tomorrow.
>


I've done only superficial testing for now, I have to build me a test
database, but I thought I'd let you know, it seems to work flawless till
now.

:^)

Thanks

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sqlalchemy" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sqlalchemy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to