the word "occasional" is very meaningful.  It usually suggests race conditions. 
   Then with the word "tornado", the baysean filters are strongly leaning 
towards "race condition" at that point :).

if an error is occurring only under volume then you have to revisit where race 
conditions can occur.

On Aug 27, 2013, at 10:32 AM, herzaso <herz...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I'm running a Tornado server without redundancy (only one process, requests 
> can arrive at the same time but will be handled one at a time)
> I do agree that for large volumes, catching the IntegrityError would be 
> better, but currently I am handling a single request at a time and I want to 
> fix this problem before I move on ...
> 
> 
> On Tuesday, August 27, 2013 5:24:07 PM UTC+3, Simon King wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 2:31 PM, herzaso <her...@gmail.com> wrote: 
> > On Tuesday, August 27, 2013 3:55:50 PM UTC+3, Simon King wrote: 
> >> 
> >> On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 1:40 PM, herzaso <her...@gmail.com> wrote: 
> >> > I have a model with an ID column set as the primary key, though i'd like 
> >> > to 
> >> > be able to identify records by 3 other columns. 
> >> > For this situation, I've added a classmethod that will fetch the record 
> >> > if 
> >> > found or a new record if not. 
> >> > The problem i'm having is that every once in a while, I get 
> >> > IntegrityError 
> >> > trying to flush a change 
> >> > 
> >> > class Foo(Base): 
> >> >     __table_args__ = (sa.UniqueConstraint('bar', 'baz', 'qux'),) 
> >> > 
> >> >     id = sa.Column(Identifier, sa.Sequence('%s_id_seq' % __tablename__), 
> >> > nullable=False, primary_key=True) 
> >> >     bar = sa.Column(sa.BigInteger) 
> >> >     baz = sa.Column(sa.BigInteger) 
> >> >     qux = sa.Column(sa.BigInteger) 
> >> >     a1 = sa.Column(sa.BigInteger) 
> >> >     a2 = sa.Column(sa.BigInteger) 
> >> > 
> >> >     @classmethod 
> >> >     def get(cls, bar=None, baz=None, qux=None, **kwargs): 
> >> >         item = session.query(cls).\ 
> >> >             filter(cls.bar== bar).\ 
> >> >             filter(cls.baz == baz).\ 
> >> >             filter(cls.qux == qux).\ 
> >> >             first() 
> >> > 
> >> >         if item: 
> >> >             for k, v in kwargs.iteritems(): 
> >> >                 if getattr(item, k) != v: 
> >> >                     setattr(item, k, v) 
> >> >         else: 
> >> >             item = cls(bar=bar, baz=baz, qux=qux, **kwargs) 
> >> > 
> >> >         return item 
> >> > 
> >> > This is the code I use to add/update records: 
> >> > 
> >> > foo = Foo.get(**item) 
> >> > session.merge(foo) 
> >> > 
> >> > I'm struggling with this problem for some time now, and would appreciate 
> >> > any 
> >> > help ... 
> >> > 
> >> 
> >> I'm not sure of the exact problem, but there are a couple of things 
> >> that you could investigate. 
> >> 
> >> Firstly, session.merge returns a copy of the object, rather than 
> >> adding the object that you supplied into the session. See 
> >> http://docs.sqlalchemy.org/en/rel_0_8/orm/session.html#merging for 
> >> details. 
> >> 
> >> Secondly, your "get" method sometimes returns objects that are already 
> >> part of the session (if they were in the database), and sometimes 
> >> objects that are not in the session. It would probably be more 
> >> consistent to always return objects that are part of the session, by 
> >> putting "session.add(item)" in your "else" clause. This would get rid 
> >> of the need for session.merge(). (If you want to be able to use the 
> >> "get" with non-global sessions, pass the session as a parameter.) 
> >> 
> >> Finally, if your session isn't auto-flushing, it would be possible for 
> >> you to call "get" twice with the same parameters and get 2 different 
> >> objects back. 
> >> 
> >> You may want to look at the UniqueObject recipe in the wiki: 
> >> http://www.sqlalchemy.org/trac/wiki/UsageRecipes/UniqueObject 
> >> 
> > Hi Simon, 
> > Thanks for the fast reply. 
> > 
> > I tried adding session.add(item) and session.flush() in the else clause in 
> > the past but that didn't solve my problem. 
> > I didn't however remove the merge, do you think that might be the problem? 
> > 
> > Regarding the flush, this code is part of an API server where a 
> > scoped_session is committed after each change. I haven't changed the 
> > autoflush parameter, and as I understand the default value is True making a 
> > flush before each commit or query. 
> > 
> > As for the UniqueObject recipe, thanks! Amazing that I never found it 
> > searching for a cure. As I see it basically does the same ... 
> > 
> > I never managed to reproduce this bug on my development environment. It 
> > only 
> > happens in my production environment. 
> > Do you suppose adding a session.add and removing the merge will solve this 
> > issue? 
> > 
> > Thanks, 
> > Ofir 
> 
> It's difficult to say without knowing more about your system. For 
> example, does your production system get multiple concurrent API 
> requests, or are they serialised? If 2 requests can come in at 
> approximately the same time and are handled by 2 different threads (or 
> processes), then it is easy to imagine that the first handler will 
> check the database, find that an entry doesn't exist, and create it. 
> But before it flushes the change to the database (or even after it 
> flushes, but before it commits, depending on your transaction 
> isolation), the second handler will check for the same object, find it 
> missing, and so create it. 
> 
> To track down problems like this, you could ensure that your 
> development environment has the same thread/process behaviour as the 
> production environment, then try submitting multiple concurrent 
> requests to it. If you add "time.sleep" statements somewhere between 
> the creation of the object and the commit of the transaction you will 
> probably find it easier to trigger. 
> 
> To actually fix the problem, you could choose to only handle a single 
> request at a time (fine if you don't expect a high volume of 
> requests). If that's not acceptable, you could catch the 
> IntegrityError and then re-process the request. 
> 
> Hope that helps, 
> 
> Simon 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "sqlalchemy" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to sqlalchemy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Reply via email to