On 2015-03-13 17:24 Michael Bayer <mike...@zzzcomputing.com> wrote: > if it works for you, then it’s great. It’s not a generalized solution > for the whole world, though. It doesn’t take into account columns > that are part of unique Index objects or columns that are mentioned > in standalone UniqueConstraint objects.
Thank you very much for bringing my view "beyond my own nose". ;) I know nothing about "unique Index objects". :D I added and linked your comment to the stackoverflow-answer. Hope this is ok for you? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sqlalchemy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
