Is this an oversight, or intentional? Until I discovered duck_type_collection, I was using a custom function I wrote that did basically the same exact thing, so I thought it was my lucky day to find it already implemented in SQLAlchemy. But it looks like it doesn't return the expected (by me at least, ha ha) results when given an instance of sqlalchemy.ext.associationproxy._AssociationDict.
Is this working as intended? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sqlalchemy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
