When reading the official SQLAlchemy documentation, I found the example
below:
### this is the **wrong way to do it** ###
class ThingOne(object):
def go(self):
session = Session()
try:
session.query(FooBar).update({"x": 5})
session.commit()
except:
session.rollback()
raise
class ThingTwo(object):
def go(self):
session = Session()
try:
session.query(Widget).update({"q": 18})
session.commit()
except:
session.rollback()
raise
def run_my_program():
ThingOne().go()
ThingTwo().go()
I don't really understand the drawbacks for this pattern. Actually I can
think of one major ADVANTAGE to this: in a multi-threading context, this
pattern can ensure that each session instance is a local variable to the
function that actually uses it.
Could someone enlighten me by giving some potential drawbacks for the
example above? Thanks.
--
SQLAlchemy -
The Python SQL Toolkit and Object Relational Mapper
http://www.sqlalchemy.org/
To post example code, please provide an MCVE: Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable
Example. See http://stackoverflow.com/help/mcve for a full description.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sqlalchemy" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sqlalchemy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
