Hi. In https://pajhome.org.uk/blog/10_reasons_to_love_sqlalchemy.html it says:
When performing highly complex queries, it is possible to define these with SQLAlchemy syntax. However, I find there's a certain level of complexity where it becomes easier to write SQL directly. In that case, you can define a database view that encompasses the complex query, and SQLAlchemy can map the view to Python objects. I spoke with my team lead about this practice, and he was open to trying it but said he had heard that SQLAlchemy may have problems using views. Does anyone on the list have anything to add here? Thanks! -- SQLAlchemy - The Python SQL Toolkit and Object Relational Mapper http://www.sqlalchemy.org/ To post example code, please provide an MCVE: Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable Example. See http://stackoverflow.com/help/mcve for a full description. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sqlalchemy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sqlalchemy/CAOvKW54y462yR4m5pOV5ukACA7v0CgCDUcrDztRBogtuE9t_GA%40mail.gmail.com.
