On Apr 6, 2007, at 5:49 PM, Mike Kent wrote:

> Hmm.  If this makes the relationship between a ThingOne and a ThingTwo
> work like a normal many-to-many relationship, I would have expected
> you to be able to something like:
>
> spam = ThingOne(name='spam')
> foo = ThingTwo(name='foo')
> bar = ThingTwo(name='bar')
> spam.twos.append(foo)
> spam.twos.append(bar)
>
> and it would automatically maintain the 'Cat' table without having to
> explicitly access it.


That also works. But you can't set the 'sorter' field that way, and I  
wanted the test to ensure the sorting happens (sorting the related  
objects is essential to my project).



--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"SQLElixir" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sqlelixir?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to