Gaetan de Menten wrote: > Sorry for the delay. I still haven't had the opportunity to look more > closely at your code and probably won't have for some time (sorry > about that... you know... life and all that stuff).
Its the same response from me! I have a lot going on right now between life and work, so I haven't had much time to spend on Elixir in a while :/ But, I am excited by the initial code that I have seen in your validation statements, but haven't gone over it enough to really provide feedback. > I'm open for discussion about this, but my personal stance at the > moment is to try to keep the scope of Elixir as it is (ie quite > narrow) but fill it as well as we can rather than going in all sorts > of directions and ending up with a semi-complete-framework. I would be open to providing an additional egg and including details about it on the Elixir page. Ideally, I would like a lot of people to start creating their own DSL statements for doing various things, including validation, tagging, etc. If we get enough of these rolling, I'd like to have something on the Elixir website that lists these "plugins" and provides a place to hold their documentation. I'd even be in favor of placing these plugins into our subversion repository, each in their own separate projects. To me, this is a great way to build up Elixir. The core provides just what Gaetan said: a declarative layer on top of SQLAlchemy, along with a basis for extending it with plugins. -- Jonathan LaCour http://cleverdevil.org --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SQLElixir" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlelixir?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
