On Feb 11, 2008 12:06 PM, Alexandre da Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > This is an interesting option I didn't think about. I'd like to hear > > opinions from other people about this as I'm not sure if it's worth > > it: are there many persons in your case (I don't think there are -- > > and those who are would probably be satisfied by the "abstract" > > concept implementation which will need to be done anyway), and is > > there a (relevant) impact (in terms of efficiency or mem usage) to > > have one more level of inheritance for all objects? > I cannot say if abstract concept will work to me, because I don't know > exactly, "what is" this concept here, (I know about abstract classes in > Java or Pascal but never in Python) what otherwise you explain in #15, > seems to fit wit my "issue"
That's pretty understandable since Python doesn't provide any specific mechanism for abstract classes. It's just how I choose to name that pattern for elixir since it is a similar concept to "abstract" classes in other languages. -- Gaëtan de Menten http://openhex.org --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SQLElixir" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlelixir?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
