I would like to contribute. But I had to study it, a lot.
On Jan 10, 12:37 pm, Gaetan de Menten <[email protected]> wrote: > > Is elixir development active ? > > Active... Not really. I have several "almost implemented" features > lying in my working copy at home, but given that I no longer use > relational databases during my day work, I only work on Elixir once in > a while (it competes with all my other hobbies). Honestly, unless > someone picks up the maintainership, it will continue to slowly slide > towards irrelevance. I'm sad to see all the effort I've put into it go > to waste, but let's face it: it's unlikely I'll ever have time to > "finish" the project (it has a quite narrow scope so finishing it > would be possible for someone with more time to devote to it than me). > > On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 06:20, Romy <[email protected]> wrote: > > Wondering because I've commented on a bug a few days ago w/out > > response (http://elixir.ematia.de/trac/ticket/61) > > Well that particular patch wasn't merged because it can break some > uses cases (it disallows having several entities with the same name in > the same module), which can be valid in some cases, while the correct > fix is elsewhere (as said in the bug report comments). And besides, > this wouldn't happen if migrate didn't use reload (which breaks a lot > of code). > > > to investigate a potentially serious bug, if it's a bug at all, > > involving transactions (http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy/ > > browse_thread/thread/f7a2e08f8be50a95). > > Doesn't seem to be elixir specific and your problem will probably be > soon resolved by Michael "Mr awesome support" Bayer... > > -- > Gaëtan de Menten -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SQLElixir" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlelixir?hl=en.
