On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 22:56 -0500, Hilmar Lapp wrote:
> On Nov 9, 2007, at 10:38 PM, Ben Faga wrote:
> 
> > It turns out that that is exactly what was happening already.  The $1
> > was being blanked (as it should be) but the MySQL producer wasn't
> > handling it properly (the postgres and oracle producers handled it  
> > just
> > fine).
> >
> > I've modified the foreign key constraint name so that if it is  
> > blank, it
> > will default to TABLENAME_fk (as opposed to being named "_1", "_2",...
> > as it was doing).
> 
> Not sure I understand correctly - did you make this change in the  
> parser (consumer)?
> 
> What you say above sounds to me like the MySQL producer is broken  
> (and should hence be the one to be fixed), not the PostgreSQL consumer.
> 
>       -hilmar

Yes and exactly.

I've committed the change in the MySQL producer.

Ben


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
-- 
sqlfairy-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sqlfairy-developers

Reply via email to