Pedro Melo wrote: > Attached, second version of the patch, based on feedback from Darren and > Dave.
Thanks Pedro. Ash sent me a PM - perhaps intended to be sent to the list? - that explained some specific weirdness of the existing behaviour. I hadn't understood that, so I owe an apology to both Ash and Pedro for my comments about BOOL and TINYINT. But I still believe strongly that backwards compatibility is the overriding concern. Ash asked me "is there anyone that actually uses and wants the current behaviour?". In my case, the answer is "I don't know". I have a lot of legacy code. I don't know which modules, if any, code around these weirdnesses and would break if I upgraded SQLT. That's the point of backwards compatibility. Cheers, Dave ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ -- sqlfairy-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sqlfairy-developers
