On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 12:35 PM Dan Kennedy <danielk1...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 5/3/63 16:11, Dominique Devienne wrote: > > I'm interested in LSM1 [1] as an alternative to SQLite [...] > > [...], I don't think it's too bad of an implementation. The > automated tests are reasonably good - although of course not as good as > SQLite's though. And the docs are stored in kind of a ridiculous place > at the moment, but I think they're quite complete. > > Not planning to develop this any further unless a big user emerges, > which is not impossible. I do intend to fix any reported bugs though.
Thanks Dan. I appreciate your candor, and support commitment. Given the above, I'll start with SQLite, and when/if I'm done with what I need to do, will try to give LSM1 a try, to compare performance, and report back. Thanks again, --DD PS: I'd still very much appreciate an LSM1 amalgamation _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
