"D. Richard Hipp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > QUESTION 1: > The default setting in version 2.8 is ON. For version 3.0 > we propose to change the default synchronous setting to FULL. > Does anybody have any problems with this?
I have no problem with this. > QUESTION 2: > We propose to eliminate default_synchronous and have the > regular synchronous pragma change the synchronous setting > persistently. Does anybody have any problems with this? A possible problem with this is that it creates a naming inconsistency. There are other "default_*" pragmas which cause a persistent change. In looking through the pragma documentation, I don't see any non-"default_*" pragmas which currently cause a persistent change, so this one would be unique. If you were to delete one of the two, I would think it would be to delete "synchronous" and retain "default_synchronous" given the meaning you are trying to portray. Unfortunately, that too would create an inconsistency (although not as significant of one) in that all of the other "default_*" pragmas have a non-"default_*" equivalent for transient use. Derrell --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
