On Tue, 12 Oct 2004, D. Richard Hipp wrote:
>Christian Smith wrote:
>>
>> If this issue is critical to your project, you should perhaps contract
>> Richard to do the changes, as I can't give any guarantees on ever getting
>> round to implementing this. I'm still in the code familiarisation phase.
>>
>
>I do not consider this a bug. INSERT OR REPLACE is not an UPDATE so
>an UPDATE trigger should not fire on an INSERT OR REPLACE. So don't
>be looking for me to change it anytime soon.
>
I was thinking more along the lines of a DELETE. That would be an accurate
semantic, would it not?
Christian
--
/"\
\ / ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN - AGAINST HTML MAIL
X - AGAINST MS ATTACHMENTS
/ \
