Clay Dowling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >>Do you know if this bug exist in 2.8.15 as well? If so, is the fix >>back-portable? >> >> > Darrell, > > I believe that the VACUUM statement didn't exist in 2.8.x, so there shouldn't > be a problem.
Sure it does. I use it in 2.8.15, so I'm quite interested in whether the bug existed in it as well. Derrell
