On 2005-05-31T20:05:29-0400, Andrew Piskorski wrote: > But BSD users are also quite aware that the BSD -> GPL process is one > way, so if you're willing to release your code under BSD at all, why > take the risk of confusing or alienating BSD-only users? Personally, > I would release as either GPL or BSD, not both.
FWIW, http://www.boost.org/LICENSE_1_0.txt seems compelling (clear, simple, no changes to the license text needed) if going the non-copyleft route (like BSD). /Allan
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
