On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 09:32 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > "D. Richard Hipp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 09:38 -0300, Gerson LuÃs Fontoura Vaz wrote: > >> I'm using SQLite for the first time... > >> > >> We are using SQLite version 2.8.15. > >> > > > > Why, oh why are you using 2.8.15 when 3.2.2 is known to be > > faster, smaller, and to contain many more features??? > > Unfortunately, the switch from using 2.8 to 3.x is not entirely trivial for > large projects.
I can understand using 2.8 for legacy projects. But notice that the original poster is using SQLite "for the first time". He has no legacy to port. Why would he *start* using an older version of the code??? > When version 3.0.0 was release, the "News" indicated that: > > "The 2.8 series of SQLite will continue to be supported with bug fixes for > the foreseeable future." > > >From your comments, it sounds like maybe the 2.8 series is no longer being > officially supported. Am I inferring correctly? > 2.8 continues to be supported. Any critical bugs are fixed punctually. But obscure and hard-to-reproduce memory leaks are given a rather low priority. (Unless you have a paid support contract :-)) -- D. Richard Hipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
