I believe the recent release can use an index for sorting, so you may want to try that.
On 8/25/05, Edwin Knoppert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > FYI: > > Duration of reading records seems longer when sorted as not. > ~600 rec's in 500ms instead of 2400 (also ~500ms) > I'm not talking about prepare but the data retrieval per record. > > -- Cory Nelson http://www.int64.org
