Howard Kapustein wrote: > /* Try to truncate the WAL file to zero bytes if the checkpoint > ** completed and fsynced (rc==SQLITE_OK) and we are in persistent > ** WAL mode (bPersist) and if the PRAGMA journal_size_limit is a > ** non-negative value (pWal->mxWalSize>=0). Note that we truncate > ** to zero bytes as truncating to the journal_size_limit might > ** leave a corrupt WAL file on disk. */ > walLimitSize(pWal, 0); > > That last comment "Note that we truncate..." is interesting. When > would this corrupt WAL rear its head?
A 'normal' checkpoint would adjust the WAL file header to record that the data has been checkpointed and is no longer valid. Regards, Clemens _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
