Yup, absolutely you are right. I just ran a new test using the same upper bound on the amount of memory used for the page cache, then I found a reasonable result.
Thank you, Dan. I did notice the cache_size change before but you made me realize it. Thanks a lot. -- Sent from: http://sqlite.1065341.n5.nabble.com/ _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
