> On Dec 20, 2018, at 9:30 AM, Peter da Silva <res...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Fuzz testing would be extremely unlikely to have caught the original > attack. Nor would fuzz testing on input be likely to hit all corrupt > database attacks. Fuzz testing using fuzzed corrupted databases might.
OK, but by those criteria, _no_ program is "immune to wandering through bad pointers”*, since no testing is 100.00% perfect, so I don’t know what your original point was… —Jens * Programs in ‘safe’ languages aren’t immune, because the interpreter/virtual machine/compiler that provides the safety isn’t immune to pointer bugs, by the same reasoning. _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
