On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 8:35 AM Захар Малиновский < [email protected]> wrote:
> I would like to know is there a way to see if this proposal rejected or > something? Is this a write ML to propose with patch? > Looks like Richard implemented what you need? https://www.sqlite.org/src/info/191a023ae708490e https://www.sqlite.org/src/info/919fec91dac4cb0d Note that he typically does not accept patches, but re implements his own version, for code attribution reasons, among others. Please review and report feedback, if you want. And yes I saw <[email protected]> suggested to use checksums, but this > means we read all the files in a source directory, that is huge. This is > a reason for relying on timestamps. If some os does not update its files > timestumps why we suffer. Content-based checks are more robust and safer, at the cost of more reading of course. timestamps can easily be changed. But sure, this is off-topic for SQLar. --DD _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list [email protected] http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
