> Le 13 juin 2019 à 23:29, Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org> a écrit : > > You are right. I had forgotten about that point. This has not been > changed even now, and so -0.0 does get truncated to +0.0 when it is > stored in the database file.
Would it cost much, performance-wise, to treat double(-0.0) apart and not convert it to integer 0 during storage binary format optimization? [This, independently of the discussion about text conversion, or not, from double(-0.0) to '-0.0' (proposal) or '0.0' (current behaviour)]. — Best Regards, Meilleures salutations, Met vriendelijke groeten, Mit besten Grüßen, Olivier Mascia _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
