Another option (Which the devs might consider) is to replace use of the asm keyword with __asm__, which is a form of the extension understood even in strict mode.
(I have no idea why gcc doesn't offer intrinsics for bit rotation, as it's a common task and shouldn't require hacks like this to reliably do efficiently). On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 8:23 AM Dennis Clarke <dcla...@blastwave.org> wrote: > On 2019-11-07 11:15, Shawn Wagner wrote: > > Does that toolchain use gcc, or a different compiler? If gcc, are you > using > > the same CFLAGS as on the redhat box (you're turning on a bunch of extra > > non-default options there)? > > > > I don't see how --with-threads can be a concern. The other options do > not qualify as a "bunch" at all. > > Regardless it looks like the codebase does strange GNU extensions. > > There must be a way to switch all that off. > > Dennis > > ps : don't top post. > > _______________________________________________ > sqlite-users mailing list > sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org > http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users > _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
