> On Nov 7, 2019, at 9:02 AM, Bernardo Ramos <be...@gensis.com.br> wrote: > > If you are interested in just the performance without the branching feature, > there are at least 3 options: > > 1. SQLigthning: I was thinking in updating it to the last version of SQLite
That would be awesome! I have looked at it a few times, but it's based on such an old version that it's useless to me in its current state. > 2. Modified version of LiteTree, without branches I'm curious how performance of LiteTree (w/o branching) compares to SQLightning, i.e. whether storing rows or pages is more efficient. Have you measured? > 3. SQLite with mmap IIRC, this is not nearly as fast as either of the LMDB-based approaches. I don't know why; presumably SQLite doesn't make as efficient use of memory-mapping. —Jens _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
