Jim Dodgen wrote: > I vote for ignoring the marketing types and stick with "serverless"
The word is intended to communicate a specific meaning to readers. Ignoring that the marketing types have changed the common meaning of "serverless" will just lead to confusion. Originally, "serverless" was a plain description without jargon, so it can be replaced with any other description with exactly the same meaning, such as "server-free", "without server", or "sans-server". Regards, Clemens _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
