You can choose what to use. An Elephant or a Dolphin :))
Fanda
On Thu, 09 Feb 2006 02:43:13 +0100, Jim C. Nasby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
See also http://sql-info.de/mysql/gotchas.html.
About the only downsides I can think of with PostgreSQL is that it's
out-of-the-box configuration is meant for like a 486 and that not quite
as many hosting providers offer it. That url has about 100 downsides to
MySQL (many of which are rather serious). PostgreSQL is also strives to
stay as close to ANSI SQL as possible and makes it nearly impossible to
configure your database in such a way that it's only a matter of time
and luck before you end up with corrupted data.
Granted, MySQL added a lot of features in 5.0, but they still focus much
less on doing things the right way than PostgreSQL does.
And remember: Feb 31st isn't a date. :)
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 07:47:47AM +1100, John Stanton wrote:
PostgreSQL implements standard SQL as well as the features of an
enterprise DBMS. On that basis if you are changing it makes sense to
change to the fuller-featured product, one in the same class as Oracle
and DB2. In the short term Mysql could be as good as PostgreSQL.
Fanda Vacek wrote:
>I'm not sure, if Postgres is better choice than MySQL. I have used both
>of them to find out which is the better one. Both of them can do
>almost anything. The choice is a matter of taste and person. We are
>free to choose:)) I'm talking about MySQL 5 and PostgreSQL 8.1.
>
>Sorry for writing this to SQLite mail-list.
>
>Fanda
>
>On Tue, 07 Feb 2006 22:35:09 +0100, John Stanton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
>
>>Jim C. Nasby wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 05:30:39PM +0100, Laurent Goussard wrote:
>>>
>>>>Hi there,
>>>>
>>>>I use SQLite on my website for 2 years now. I do like SQLite a lot
and
>>>>will use it for a lot of new web projects but, because I got more
and
>>>>more traffic, I consider to move this one to MySQL in order to
reduce
>>>>the over load of my computer (I host it @ home).
>>>>
>>>>Do you know if there is a way to convert easily an SQLite database
>>>>into a MySQL one ?
>>>>(I'm especially thinking about the escapestring and other "create
>>>>table [myTable] {" issues...)
>>>
>>> FWIW, I believe SQLite's syntax is closer to PostgreSQL's than it
>>>is to
>>>MySQL, so it might me easier to migrate that direction...
>>
>>
>>If you are migrating to an enterprise level DBMS, PostgreSQL is a
>>better choice than Mysql. It is fully featured with all the
>>qualities of DB2 and Oracle but without the expense.
>>
>>Note that you will need considerably more machine resources to run a
>>"heavier" DBMS than Sqlite. For example on our 166MHz, 256MB RS/6000
>>PostgreSQL is sluggish but on our dual processor 1.2GHz, 2GB P-Series
>>it is lightning fast. Sqlite runs fast on the 166MHz machine.
>>
>
>
