Monday, May 15, 2006, 15:02:09, Jay Sprenkle wrote: >> Is there a quicker way to get rid of a bunch of tables or I'm wrong >> in something unseen (by me) ?
> If you're dropping all the tables just drop the database (delete the file). ... of course :-) > Otherwise I don't believe there is a faster method. You might redesign > to make it faster though. Place all the tables you regularly drop into > a separate database. This is perhaps the best solution. I'm still curious what causes this (audible) disk activity/journaling, while dropping the tables. Without vacuum I had suspected, the library only deletes some indexing information (without urge to touch the bulk of the data more or less). But, obviously there is more behind the scene .. Micha --
