Roberto-10 wrote: > > On 24/05/06, Christian Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Attach a patch to the ticket that implements your new functions. Send >> your >> declaration of dedication of the code to the public domain to the list, >> and hope DRH includes the patch in the next release. > > IIRC, That has been suggested in the past, the consensus was to not > include extra functions, in keeping with the 'lite' in the project > name. > >
I can see the argument for this, but these extra functions are part of the ANSI SQL-92 spec, so it is in keeping with the aim of achieving 100% SQL-92 compatibility????? Otherwise you might say make it lighter, ditch triggers, views and most of the the other SQL already implemented? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Extra+functions+-+New+Project--t1674436.html#a4543591 Sent from the SQLite forum at Nabble.com.
