Unfortunately DEBUG builds change timing entirely on windows platforms. I
would suggest creating a release build with symbols.

Mike

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Joel Cochran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Gesendet: Dienstag, 17. April 2007 20:59
An: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
Betreff: Re: [sqlite] Still getting "Insertion failed because database is
full." errors

I've had him sit beside my in my office and attempt to recreate it, both
using his device and mine, but it never happens.  Actually, I did get it to
happen once on his machine, but I was not connected to my PC, so I connected
and tried to recreate it through DEBUG but could not.  The last time it
happened in the field, I had him stop using the device and bring it to me so
that I could see the Stack Trace (which I sent to the list).  With neither
his device nor mine can I recreate the problem in DEBUG.  It is very
frustrating.

Thanks,

Joel


On 4/17/07, Jonas Sandman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> What is the guy on in the field doing that you are not? Are you using 
> his device for the testing?
> Since it takes minutes for him to encounter the error it can't be that 
> hard to recreate. Follow him around for an hour or so and see how he 
> uses the program. It could easily be something he's doing that you 
> aren't...
>
> On 4/17/07, Joel Cochran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > The saga continues...
> >
> > I was very excited by the idea that there was something wrong with 
> > the
> CF
> > Card.  The theory fits all the facts: it explains why the original 
> > database threw unspecified errors, it explains why now SQLite is 
> > throwing errors, it explains why I can't reproduce the problem in 
> > house or on my
> machine.  It
> > just seemed to explain everything, so yesterday I went out and 
> > bought a brand-spankin' new SanDisk CF card.  I loaded it up with 
> > the database, installed it on my tester's machine, and this morning 
> > it went back out
> to
> > the field for testing.
> >
> > Within minutes, he encountered the same error.
> >
> > Now I just don't believe the problem is with the card, so I feel 
> > that I
> am
> > right back at square one.  I'm really at my wits end and don't know 
> > what to do next.  I am going to go ahead and install the database on 
> > the device memory instead of removable media, just to test it out, 
> > but I have no faith that it will change anything.  When that fails, 
> > I will send the tester
> out
> > with another device entirely, but again I expect the same results.
> >
> > I'm convinced now that the problem is with the application 
> > architecture, but I have no idea what to look at anymore.  I've 
> > stared and fiddled with
> this
> > code so much that I'm ready to throw in the towel.  But since I'd 
> > like
> to
> > keep my job that isn't an option.  If I had hair, I'd pull it out.
> >
> > Any help at all would be appreciated.
> >
> > --
> > Joel Cochran
> >
> >
> >
> > On 4/13/07, Michael Ruck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Unless things have changed recently, the following should still be
> valid
> > > for
> > >
> > > Windows Mobile/Windows CE devices: Usually these devices do not 
> > > power
> > off,
> > > but
> > > stay in a standby state where the memory is always powered. Check 
> > > if that's the case with your system and move as much as possible 
> > > into RAM or a RAM
> > disk,
> > > if that
> > > feature is provided by the windows mobile kernel built for your
> device.
> > >
> > > If that's not possible, I'd suggest replacing CF cards with micro
> drives
> > -
> > > these
> > > are regular hard drives in a CF card format. I'm not up to date on
> > storage
> > > space,
> > > but should be sufficient for your needs.
> > >
> > > To test the cards I'd put them in a card reader format it and fill 
> > > it completely up with zeros. When a flash card erases a byte, it 
> > > sets all bits to
> ones
> > > and
> > > upon
> > > write clears those, which need to be zero. So to test all bits you
> > really
> > > need to
> > > zero out the entire card. This will also give the controller in 
> > > the
> card
> > a
> > > chance
> > > to remap bad sectors with spares. Finally you determine the file 
> > > size
> of
> > > the
> > > card,
> > > when you receive the first write error. This is (approximately) 
> > > the
> > number
> > > of bytes
> > > the card can store (at that point in time) and falling.
> > >
> > > It seems some cards even return "read errors", when they hit a
> defective
> > > sector
> > > upon read. Maybe the actual error code just gets lost/mangled on 
> > > the
> way
> > > up
> > > and the
> > > actual error is just a simple read error ;) I've seen reports 
> > > about
> this
> > > with some
> > > digital cameras, which would not even let people view the pictures
> taken
> > a
> > > minute
> > > ago.
> > >
> > > Mike
> > >
> > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > > Von: John Stanton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Gesendet: Freitag, 13. April 2007 23:44
> > > An: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
> > > Betreff: Re: [sqlite] Still getting "Insertion failed because 
> > > database
> > is
> > > full." errors
> > >
> > > You might find some joy in the baby disk drives such as installed 
> > > in
> the
> > > original ipods.
> > >
> > > Can you substitute RAM with a battery backup if the memory card is
> > always
> > > in
> > > the device?
> > >
> > > Joel Cochran wrote:
> > > > Thanks John and Dennis,
> > > > At least now I have something to look at.  I will look into the 
> > > > CF problem next.
> > > >
> > > > The database itself gets generated on a PC and then transferred 
> > > > to
> the
> > > > CF Card.  During testing and development, this could have been 
> > > > 20-30 times a day, constantly erasing and recreating the 
> > > > existing DB.  We have also sent large numbers of JPGs along with 
> > > > the database in the past (there are none now, but have been 
> > > > before).  So these cards
> have
> > > > been written over a lot, perhaps that is the problem.
> > > >
> > > > I think to test this, I will send the device back to the field 
> > > > with
> a
> > > > brand new card and see if the problem persists.  If the user can 
> > > > go several days of normal use without the problem, then I'll be
> convinced
> > > > that it is the card.  Out of curiosity I just checked the CF 
> > > > cards we've been using: on the development machine (which has 
> > > > NEVER shown the error) I have a SanDisk CF Card.  On the Testing 
> > > > machine that is having the problem, there is a PNY Technologies 
> > > > CF Card.  I wouldn't be surprised if the SanDisk card isn't 
> > > > simply better than the PNY card, so there is something else to
consider.
> > > >
> > > > Once actual field use begins, the database will be replaced 
> > > > every
> week
> > > > or so, along with a fair number of images (like 100-300 a
> week).  The
> > > > purpose of the application would have every record in the 
> > > > database being updated and some new ones created.  And it would 
> > > > be that way week in and week out, essentially forever.  We may 
> > > > eventually port
> it
> > > > over to very small Tablet PCs, but right now it is all Windows
> Mobile
> > > > 5.  This is one of the reasons I went with SQLite, so that down 
> > > > the road I wouldn;t have to reinvent the database piece of the 
> > > > software for a different platform.
> > > >
> > > > Given all this, I will definitely look into the link Dennis
> sent.  The
> > > > company is not going to be happy replacing CF cards all the 
> > > > time, so if that can extend the wear then it will be welcome.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks a lot,
> > > >
> > > > Joel
> > > >
> > > > On 4/13/07, Dennis Cote <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >>
> > > >> Joel Cochran wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Or do you mean over the course of the lifetime of a CF card 
> > > >> > it
> can
> > > >> > only be used so much?  That might apply to this scenario, 
> > > >> > these cards have been written over continuously for the last 6
months.
> > > >> >
> > > >> Joel,
> > > >>
> > > >> Yes, that is exactly the problem. You should look at using a 
> > > >> flash file system such as http://sourceware.org/jffs2/ that 
> > > >> uses "wear
> > > leveling"
> > > >> algorithms to spread the writes over all the flash devices 
> > > >> blocks
> if
> > > >> you are writing often.
> > > >>
> > > >> HTH
> > > >> Dennis Cote
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
>


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to