> >The use of sqlite3_bind_blob() for this is MUCH faster, and >surely requires less code. May I ask for more detail on why >you chose to generate SQL statements with huge blob literals?
I'm also doing sqlite networked, so all the bits have to be encoded and transmitted anyway. Not using blobs maintains a uniform set of procedures for local and networked sqlite. -- ie; I can link with real sqlite, or my network stub, with no change in the main code. For sure, some additional hair could specialize the usage so the local could be more effecient, but that's for the future. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
