> > Yes I did the same experiment with a lock that made thread A wait > > until B was finished. So actually only one thread can be active at the time. > > I don't see how the outcome of this experiment can be of any > > interest, as there is no time reduction any longer. But your guess is > > right that, it works. > >How would multiple threads be faster than a single one when you are accessing a single resource?
Assumably the thread that is accessing the database either spends some time gathering data to write or processing data it read. The single resource isn't in use during that time. This email was sent to you by Reuters, the global news and information company. To find out more about Reuters visit www.about.reuters.com Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of Reuters Limited. Reuters Limited is part of the Reuters Group of companies, of which Reuters Group PLC is the ultimate parent company. Reuters Group PLC - Registered office address: The Reuters Building, South Colonnade, Canary Wharf, London E14 5EP, United Kingdom Registered No: 3296375 Registered in England and Wales ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
