On 6/12/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Andrew Finkenstadt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I see a reference to SQLITE_BUSY_RESERVED_LOCK in version 3.3.15 (the first > one with the amalgamation), but there does not appear to be support for it > in the remainder of the source file. > > Is that correct? So it appears....
And, alamgamation 3.3.17 does not implement it either. :) I'll implement a loop on SQLITE_BUSY returned from the initial DML statement in a transaction, since this appears to be the one case where sqlite busy handler is ignored. :) --a
