DRH,

I seemed to recall posting that ticket. 

I don't have any good solutions for the txn journal lookup at the moment.
  Maybe a form of block chaining from the sourcing DB to the txn journal offset.

  Each txn journal modification would point to the prior versions offset. So 
that multiple changes to a block within a transaction could be efficiently 
traversed within the TXN journal. Only the last change offset is needed to be 
maintained, ie a tail pointer. 

When a change is written to the journal first the current pending offset would 
need to be made to the block. Then the original version would be written. The 
on disk txn version (writer) would contain a reference to the location in the 
journal, Along with a global TXN change number from the Master block.

Readers would determine that the on disk version does not match the Master 
Block version and would use the on disks journal offset to access the journal 
file.

Locks on the journal file would need to be maintained indicating a shared read 
request so that the jouranl would not go away whilst the read is in progress.

Just my blue sky idea of resolving read/write concurrency. At a minimum either  
the original block would need to be made accessible (this idea) or a mechanism 
to perform block versioning and block level rollback to a prior version would 
need to be developed in order to improve read/write concurrency.

Block level rollback to a version can be accomplished but would be a major 
change in direction and philosophy.

Regards,
Ken






[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: "Dan Petitt"  wrote:
> Richard, i noticed this ticket in the system:
> http://www.sqlite.org/cvstrac/tktview?tn=2417,8
> 
> And wondered if its something that is getting any serious thought or
> something that is just a faint possibility?
> 

Seems to be an incompatibly file format change, which more
or less rules it out for any consideration.  Also unaddressed
in the proposal is how to locate a particular page within
the journal file without having to do (performance killing)
sequential scan of the possible very large file.

--
D. Richard Hipp 


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------


Reply via email to