There was a time when it used auto vacuum, but it was suggested that we stop using that so it was disabled. I have no way of knowing if those databases were one of the ones that had it enabled. At one point we did a vacuum on idle too, but we no longer do that either.
Cheers, Shawn On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 2:34 AM, Dan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On May 5, 2008, at 5:33 AM, Shawn Wilsher wrote: > >> Hey folks, >> >> We've started to see a crash in syncJournal that happens in the same >> place in a previously mentioned e-mail to this list: >> http://www.mail-archive.com/sqlite-users@sqlite.org/msg29637.html >> >> We don't have any steps to reproduce, but we have a bug tracking >> the issue: >> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=432148 >> >> More details can be found in the bug. > > Hi Shawn, > > Do these databases use auto-vacuum? Incremental vacuum? Fts3? > > Thanks, > Dan. > > > > >> >> Cheers, >> >> Shawn Wilsher >> Mozilla Developer >> _______________________________________________ >> sqlite-users mailing list >> sqlite-users@sqlite.org >> http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users > > _______________________________________________ > sqlite-users mailing list > sqlite-users@sqlite.org > http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users > _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
