Robert Lehr wrote: > Oracle does not allow DDL statements to be executed in transactions, > i.e., it does but the statements are COMMITted as they are executed, > thus cannot be rolled back. > > PostgreSQL does allow DDL statements to be executed in transactions, > i.e., if a DDL query fails then then entire transaction is rolled back > and no tables, indices, etc., are created, modified, etc. > > Which behaviour is implemented in SQLite?
AFAIK, SQLite has DDL subject to transactions, like you described for Postgres. And that's just how it should be. Transactions should subjugate *all* DBMS activity. -- Darren Duncan _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
