Robert, I looked at CoreLab's provider recently and didn't get the impression that they used your code at all. It's separate DLL's, very different classes, is missing some functionality that you provide (like custom functions written in .NET) but has other functionality (like robust connection pooling). Also the interop is very different and it uses three dll's, one of which they install to system32 (sucks).
We were interested in their product precisely because it is commercial and thus includes support. Lack of custom functions is a deal breaker though--we use them extensively. Richard, CoreLab's product is commercial. Did you try asking their support? In any case, if you're considering a switch to Mono in the future than I'd highly recommend Robert's provider which we use and is very well written and is included with Mono (with some alterations). http://sqlite.phxsoftware.com Thanks, Sam ----------------------------------------------------------------- We're Hiring! Seeking passionate Flex, C#, or C++ (RTSP, H264) developer in the Washington D.C. Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 8:17 PM, Robert Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm not exactly sure what they've built on top of my (free) provider, but > it > looks like a good portion of their core codebase is my code. It's a bummer > they decided to split with the free spirit of SQLite and charge for their > provider (based on my public domain code), but to each his own. > > Robert > http://sqlite.phxsoftware.com > > _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
