Alexey, Do you mean the sqlite3_busy_timeout( ) ? I never thought I could use it for simulating this. I will give that a shot.
Thanks, -Alex On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 11:40 AM, Alexey Pechnikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > В сообщении от Wednesday 02 July 2008 19:11:58 Alex Katebi написал(а): > > I have an in memory database and a single multiplexed thread for all > > readers and writes. > > I like to be able to read tables without locking out other readers and > > writers. > > Is this possible? I don't mind writers using locks but some of my readers > > are slow and I don't want them to hold locks for long periods. > > You can simulate this. See "db timeout" function. > _______________________________________________ > sqlite-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users > _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list [email protected] http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
