> Unfortunately I oversimplified my explanation, and the processing  
> that is required is somewhat more complex.

Perhaps you could give more detail about your data. It seems to me  
that you should restructure your data so it is "atomic", ie so that  
each bit of data appears in its own row in a related table, rather  
than having multiple values in one row. As you're probably aware, this  
is a fundamental of database design. Otherwise you're unscrambling the  
egg, which is very error prone and inefficient.

Tom
BareFeet

  --
Comparison of SQLite GUI tools:
http://www.tandb.com.au/sqlite/compare/?ml

_______________________________________________
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users

Reply via email to