"Jos van den Oever" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > There's two tables with the same problem. One has an undetermined > number of values: 'm' points to user-definable tag. > In the other table I have about 110 values. This could be spread over > two integer columns. I'm a bit hesitant to use integer values as > bitmasks. How is the signedness handled in the binding? Should I > simply use a uint64_t and not worry?
I believe it would just work. But, if you think that would be a problem, you can use only 63 bits. Two columns will still cover 126 possible values. Igor Tandetnik _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
