Just food for thought.
In that case, your group (assuming you are the sqlite ADO.NET guy) appears to
ship an all inclusive build of sqlite in the adapter, but then the fully
managed only libs that dynamically link of to the platform compiled binaries
for sqlite? Why not include within the shipped build the binaries compiled
properly to allow your ado.net stuff to work properly.
Developers would be able to know for SURE that they have the right binaries for
both Linux and windows.
>From a developer "usability" standpoint, having the target binaries for all
>platforms in your install would be really nice. So this is just a humble
>request. We then just have to copy the right libs into our installer and all
>will be happy.> From: sqlite_l...@bcsft.com> To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org>
>Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 18:21:39 -0700> Subject: Re: [sqlite] SPAM: Re:
>Question on missing Entry Point for Sqlite 3> > I can try and make my
>System.Data.SQLite provider fail gracefully if this> API function doesn't
>exist -- but it may not be an error I can catch easily.> .NET tends to link
>these calls when the class is referenced, and it happens> in a place at
>runtime that I don't think I can put try/catch blocks around.> > Also, a lot
>of ADO.NET functionality will not be available if this> preprocessor symbol is
>missing, and Entity Framework stuff will definitely> not work properly.> > >
>-----Original Message-----> From: sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org>
>[mailto:sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org] On Behalf Of W Allan Edwards> Sent:
>Tuesday, February 10, 2009 5:00 PM> To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org> Subject:
>SPAM: Re: [sqlite] Question on missing Entry Point for Sqlite 3> > > I have
>emailed Miguel of Mono directly, the mono contact form, and the> ado.net
>provider guys. I have not heard anything back from anbody but this> almighty
>sqlite group.> > Whether the doctor turns this code off by default or not I
>would hope> somebody makes the provider behavior the same cross platform. : -
>)> > You guys are awesome at support. Thanks again for exploration of this
>issue> with me.> > Allan> Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 14:17:30 -0800> From:
>rog...@rogerbinns.com>> To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org> Subject: Re: [sqlite]
>Question on missing Entry> Point for Sqlite 3> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED
>MESSAGE-----> Hash: SHA1> > D.> Richard Hipp wrote:> > These two factors are
>sufficient to convince me to> leave it turned off > > by default.> > You are
>aware that last year you> turned it on by default for the> libraries you build
>:-)> >> http://www.sqlite.org/cvstrac/chngview?cn=5539> > I'd guess that this
>whole> issue arose because the .net wrapper people> used the Windows SQLite
>DLL> from sqlite.org and only tested on Windows> so they didn't realise the>
>symbols were optional and not on by default> by anyone compiling using>
>./configure such as Mac and Linux folk.> > Roger> -----BEGIN PGP>
>SIGNATURE-----> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)> >>
>iEYEARECAAYFAkmQq3YACgkQmOOfHg372QSfSgCgnxTy7YkajElmuwRYM783e/Ci>>
>u6YAn0HFYiyYNd9MWXV+MovZkBP1jlXg> =K8D6> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----->>
>_______________________________________________> sqlite-users mailing list>>
>sqlite-users@sqlite.org>>
>http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users>
>_______________________________________________> sqlite-users mailing list>
>sqlite-users@sqlite.org>
>http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users> > >
>_______________________________________________> sqlite-users mailing list>
>sqlite-users@sqlite.org>
>http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
_______________________________________________
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
