I'd be willing to bet that amongst experienced SQLite users, you're in the minority.
More importantly, I don't think Dr. Hipp agrees with you, so the discussion is very likely moot. :) -T On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 9:02 AM, <sqlite.20.tomca...@spamgourmet.com> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I'm new to sqlite and this mailing list and hope to get some help > here. I've used SQLite for some projects now and I must say, that it > is the fastes database I ever used. Great work! > > But there is one thing, that I really dislike, because I get errors > sometimes with this and that is the type guessing or the untyped way > sqlite returns the data. So I searched the web and found > http://www.sqlite.org/datatype3.html where strict affinity is > described. I thought great, but how do I enable this option. > > After some search I found the thread from Feb. 2008. It sounds like > that isn't a big code change and Samuel Neff wrote exactly that what I > think about this : > >> But the important point is that no matter how much discussion we have, we >> will never all agree that untyped is better than typed or that typed is >> better than typed. That's why an option so individual developers can choose >> is good. We don't have to agree, with an option we can agree to disagree. >> >> Sam > > So now my question: Why is this not implemented? I'd really like this > option!! > > Jan > > _______________________________________________ > sqlite-users mailing list > sqlite-users@sqlite.org > http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users > _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
