Maybe I am totally mistaken.
Assume I always use the latest sqlite_shell.exe program. I do not want to
change anything in this program,
then I cannot connect to my virtual file system which is written in C and
stored in "myExtension.dll".
In contrast loadable extensions can be used.
For me loadable extensions and virtual file systems are somehow similar both
communicate via a specified interface with sqlite (although on different
levels). But the usage of loadable extensions seems more convenient and I
wonder why?
Best Martin
________________________________
Von: Igor Tandetnik <itandet...@mvps.org>
An: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
Gesendet: Donnerstag, den 26. März 2009, 20:30:33 Uhr
Betreff: Re: [sqlite] virtual file system
Martin Pfeifle wrote: > Thanks. > I appreciate very much, the way I can add my
own loadable extension > myExtension.dll by simply calling on SQL-level >
select load_extension("myExtension.dll") without changing anything in > C. What
do you mean, without changing anything in C? What is myExtension.dll written
in? Can't it call sqlite3_vfs_register during its initialization? Igor
Tandetnik _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing
list sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
_______________________________________________
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
