yes true, case closed then ! Many thanks for all of your answers.
Cheers, Sylvain On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 12:17 PM, P Kishor <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 5:02 AM, Hamish Allan <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 8:59 AM, Sylvain Pointeau > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> I can perfectly understand the decision made few years ago,and the > result is > >> splendid, I use SQLite every days. > >> > >> I am just wondering why not introducing C++? for better memory > management > >> for example (RAII) > >> > >> I am just wondering, don't reply aggressively please ... > > > > If you keep asking when you've already received a perfectly good > > answer (about portability), people will start to think you're trying > > to start an argument (about memory management). > > Indeed. Very good reply. > > To Sylvain, once again: speculating on what went into the minds of the > developers, when they set out to develop SQLite, they chose the best, > most concise, most portable, most universally compilable, mother of > almost all languages. Once they developed something that was free, > fast and cheap, there was no reason to change. Case closed. > > If you thing C++ can do a better job at doing what SQLite does on all > the variety of platforms that it runs on flawlessly, well, the source > code is available in public domain -- go ahead and create SQLite++ by > transcribing each function into the language of your choice. > > May the better plan win. > > > -- > Puneet Kishor > _______________________________________________ > sqlite-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users > _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list [email protected] http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
