2009/6/14 Olaf Schmidt <s...@online.de>: > Interesting approach - (such a mem-vfs offers some nice > options at the serverside, once it is done). > > Did you already tested, how the whole approach behaves > in concurrency-scenarios with e.g. only 4-8 concurrent clients? > Using your schema, especially the concurrent writes should get > a nice boost. > > I imagine a simple script, which is executed by each client- > process and could fill-up a fresh DB to a certain amount of > records in a single table maybe (to keep the test-scenario simple). > > Each client could do (with a 1:10 relation of writes and reads) > > Loop 1000 times > With LoopCounter Modulo 7 (case-switch) > case 0: Insert one single record > case 1: Insert 10 records > case 2: Insert 100 records > case 3: Update one single Record > case 4: Update 10 affected Records > case 5: Update 100 affected Record > case 6: Delete one single Record > End of WritePart > > Followed by 10 different Read-Jobs, > each requesting a completely delivered > resultset, based on different where-clauses, etc. > reporting only the recordcount to the console or > into a file, together with the current timing > > (maybe fill up two different tables - and also include > some Joins for the read-direction-jobs) > End loop >
Did you mean to do this test for one user? The request info: { "method" : "execute", "params" : [ { "dbfile" : 0, "user" : "foobar", "dbname" : "addrbook", "sql" : [ "insert into addrbook values ( 1, \"f...@bar.com\" )", "select * from addrbook" ] } ], "id" : "foobar" } The server will lock the user ( foobar ) while processing this request. If the server receives two requests for one user at the same time, it will process this two requests serial. _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users