Thanks again Dan for the quick response.
I understood.
Is this also true for any other database file attached to these  
threads connections that, as the main.db file, are used for read-only  
operations but might have one or more threads reading from it at the  
same time?

Alessandro.

On 27/07/2009, at 13:27, Dan wrote:

>
> While compiling any statement (sqlite3_prepare_v2()), or while  
> stepping
> (sqlite3_step()) a statement that accesses the main database, a mutex
> associated with the in-memory cache of the main database will be held.
>
> Dan.
>
>
>
> On Jul 27, 2009, at 11:16 PM, Alessandro Merolli wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>      I'm using SQLite latest version (3.6.16) with shared-cache enable in
>> a process that has around 5 threads. Database connections for each
>> thread are created with the same main database file. After that, each
>> connection is attached to a particular database file (one for each
>> thread) using the same schema name. Final structure is similar to the
>> following:
>>
>>      Main database file: main.db
>>      Thread-1 database file: thread1.db
>>      Thread-2 database file: thread2.db
>>      Thread-3 database file: thread3.db
>>      Thread-4 database file: thread4.db
>>      Thread-5 database file: thread5.db
>>
>>      Thread-1 connection is opened with the main.db file and attaches the
>> thread1.db as "extradb" schema name;
>>      Thread-2 connection is opened with the main.db file and attaches the
>> thread2.db as "extradb" schema name;
>>      Thread-3 connection is opened with the main.db file and attaches the
>> thread3.db as "extradb" schema name;
>>      Thread-4 connection is opened with the main.db file and attaches the
>> thread4.db as "extradb" schema name;
>>      Thread-5 connection is opened with the main.db file and attaches the
>> thread5.db as "extradb" schema name;
>>
>>      Every SQL statement submitted to the process and passed to one of
>> these threads can read global informations maintained in the main.db
>> database file ("main" schema) and write/read particular informations
>> in the "extradb" schema in such a way that one thread does not need  
>> to
>> wait for another thread to write its information, since each thread
>> has the "extradb" schema attached to a particular database file.
>>
>>      Shared-cache is used for 2 reasons:
>>      - to improve main.db database file data access; and,
>>      - use the "Unlock Notification Feature" (sqlite3_unlock_notify) to
>> avoid many SQLITE_LOCKED errors based on the code provided in 
>> http://www.sqlite.org/unlock_notify.html
>> .
>>
>>      In my understanding, the expected behavior should be:
>>      - If a SQL statement with only read (heavy) operations is passed to
>> Thread-1; and,
>>      - Another SQL statement with a write (and some reads) operations is
>> passed to Thread-3;
>>      - Both should run in parallel in a multi-core system.
>>
>>      But, it seems that the Thread-3 is waiting for the Thread-1 to  
>> finish
>> its work before continue.
>>      This behavior is turning the solution into a non-scalable solution.
>>
>>      As far as I could debug (and understand) using Visual Studio 2005,  
>> it
>> seems that Thread-3 (in the above example) is waiting in for a lock  
>> in
>> the sqlite3BtreeEnterAll function. See the piece of the call stack
>> below:
>>
>>>     sqlite3.dll!winMutexEnter(sqlite3_mutex * p=0x012fb2d8)  Line 15159
>>      sqlite3.dll!sqlite3BtreeEnterAll(sqlite3 * db=0x1bb05ac8)  Line
>> 36706 + 0x11 bytes
>>      sqlite3.dll!sqlite3LockAndPrepare(sqlite3 * db=0x00000000, const
>> char * zSql=0x00bbbbc0, int nBytes=180, int saveSqlFlag=1,
>> sqlite3_stmt * * ppStmt=0x00000000, const char * * pzTail=0x0965f63c)
>> Line 9672
>>      sqlite3.dll!sqlite3_prepare_v2(sqlite3 * db=0x1bb05ac8, const char
>> * zSql=0x00bbbbc0, int nBytes=180, sqlite3_stmt * *  
>> ppStmt=0x013a9094,
>> const char * * pzTail=0x0965f63c)  Line 9747 + 0x1f bytes
>>      apr_dbd_sqlite3.dll!sqlite3_blocking_prepare_v2(sqlite3 *
>> db=0x00000000, const char * zSql=, int nSql=, sqlite3_stmt * *
>> ppStmt=0x00000000, const char * * pz=0x00000000)  Line 247 + 0x10
>> bytes
>>      apr_dbd_sqlite3.dll!dbd_sqlite3_select(apr_pool_t *
>> pool=0x013a9050, apr_dbd_t * sql=0x029cc040, apr_dbd_results_t * *
>> results=0x0965f688, const char * query=0x00bbbbc0, int seek=0)  Line
>> 307 + 0x33 bytes
>>      libaprutil-1.dll!apr_dbd_select(const apr_dbd_driver_t *
>> driver=0x00a66270, apr_pool_t * pool=0x013a9050, apr_dbd_t *
>> handle=0x029cc040, apr_dbd_results_t * * res=0x0965f688, const char *
>> statement=0x00bbbbc0, int random=0)  Line 319 + 0x22 bytes
>>
>>      While Thread-1 call stack looks like this:
>>
>>>     sqlite3.dll!sqlite3VdbeExec(Vdbe * p=0x1c471318)  Line 52862
>>      sqlite3.dll!sqlite3Step(Vdbe * p=0x00000000)  Line 49388 + 0x7 bytes
>>      sqlite3.dll!sqlite3_step(sqlite3_stmt * pStmt=)  Line 49449 + 0x7
>> bytes
>>      apr_dbd_sqlite3.dll!sqlite3_blocking_step(sqlite3_stmt *
>> pStmt=0x00000000)  Line 220 + 0x6 bytes
>>      apr_dbd_sqlite3.dll!dbd_sqlite3_select(apr_pool_t *
>> pool=0x01340958, apr_dbd_t * sql=0x012e1e28, apr_dbd_results_t * *
>> results=0x09b5f688, const char * query=0x0139c1b8, int seek=0)  Line
>> 324 + 0x5 bytes
>>      libaprutil-1.dll!apr_dbd_select(const apr_dbd_driver_t *
>> driver=0x00a66270, apr_pool_t * pool=0x01340958, apr_dbd_t *
>> handle=0x012e1e28, apr_dbd_results_t * * res=0x09b5f688, const char *
>> statement=0x0139c1b8, int random=0)  Line 319 + 0x22 bytes
>>
>>      Additional information about the SQLite library in use:
>>      - Version 3.6.16 (amalgamation source)
>>      - Preprocessor definitions used to build the library:
>>              - SQLITE_THREADSAFE=1
>>              - TEMP_STORE=3
>>              - SQLITE_DEFAULT_CACHE_SIZE=65568
>>              - SQLITE_DEFAULT_TEMP_CACHE_SIZE=65568
>>              - SQLITE_MAX_ATTACHED=30
>>              - SQLITE_ENABLE_COLUMN_METADATA
>>              - SQLITE_ENABLE_UNLOCK_NOTIFY
>>
>>
>>      Any observation or suggestion about this behavior is appreciated.
>>      Thanks for your time.
>>
>>      Regards,
>>      Alessandro Merolli.
>>
>>
>>      
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> sqlite-users mailing list
>> sqlite-users@sqlite.org
>> http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> sqlite-users mailing list
> sqlite-users@sqlite.org
> http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users

_______________________________________________
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users

Reply via email to