On Tue, 2009-09-08 at 09:45 +0200, Marian Aldenhoevel wrote:
> C) A silly idea.
> 
> I could also split the database file into two copies.
> 
If the readers can tolerate data that is one update behind
currency then you could use two database files and have the
reading program(s) switch to the other database after each
round of updates.

In the background apply the same updates to the off-line copy.

No need to copy the database entirely except at the very
start of use.

By choosing the number of updates to make in each cycle you
have the possibility to limit the degree of "out of date".


_______________________________________________
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users

Reply via email to